Ok, a god created it all. You could start out and say that's the big bang. Everything has to start somewhere, so there's no real trick involved here. Every religion and tribal story ever has a starting point, so let's see how we go from there.

The first issue for biblical accuracy is at 1.2.

Being without form and empty is a great start, because that could easily describe the dust cloud which earth is presumed to have formed from.

However, the waters didn't form until much, much later, and the light predated the earth by some billions of years, so, not even close. The dividing of light into darkness is the first real clue that the story is made up and not of divine origin.

There is division between light and dark, the earth just rotates on its axis. This is obviously a naive effort to use what little human knowledge existed to give some kind of rational explanation - and it's so wrong that it cannot be considered as having any outside knowledge.

Biblical astrophysics = fail

A sky in the middle of the water?

So the water and sky were mixed up? Did gravity not exist then? Very strange, and if someone's able to advise me how that is anything like any kind of reality, I'd love an explanation. Rain clouds won't work as they are not in any way "above the sky".

Biblical meteorology = fail

The land and water separating is not too bad, but there's some awful chronology on the way!

Seed bearing plants didn't appear until after all forms of animals aside from mammals had arisen.

Again, the bible's explanation is clearly a naive attempt to explain something rationally - animals are far more complicated than plants, so plants must have arisen first. Alas, scientific evidence is complete and shows that the first flowering plants did not arrive until well after the dinosaurs.

Even if you want to be pedantic and claim "seed-bearing" plants such as conifers, you'd better be ready to eat one to show that point. And even they originated only ~340 mya, far less time than many different animal types.

Biblical botany = fail.

Again, we see a clear miss by the biblical scholars.

It shows that those biblical scholars had been smart enough to figure that the stars conformed to patterns, and that within the patterns there were daily and annual movements, in accordance with the seasons. Then, they confirm it for us by again placing the earth at the centre.

Biblical astronomy = fail

Another naive and obvious attempt to categorise animals and plants.

Mammals are smarter than everything else, so must have been created last.

Alas, mammals pre-date birds by many millions of years.

Biblical palaeontology = fail

Biblical empathy = fail